Wednesday, December 16, 2015

Martial Thoughts Fightin Words Episode 2: Martial Arts Fiction


powered by podcast garden


Download the episode HERE


Link

Buying Link

Contacts

Recorded: 12/16/2015 
Intro Music: Fight the Good Fight by Free

Topic of the Week: Martial Arts Fiction Books
Sensei Series by John Donahue
The Matador Series by Steve Perry 

 

Contact Information
Twitter Account@martialthoughts

Friday, November 27, 2015

4/5 Stars for Bruce Lee The Tao of Gung Fu

In the interest of full disclosure, I received this book from the publisher for review purposes
Title: Bruce Lee The Tao of Gung Fu
Edited by: John Little
Publisher: Tuttle
Format: Softcover
Cover Price: $19.95 $13.97(US)

    Today in America it is our national holiday dedicated to consumerism known as "Black Friday."  It is the day many of us will willingly practice a mixed martial art called "Buy Fu."  It is a modern martial art which focuses on a combination "karate chops shops" and kara "cart-rate."  But seriously, its dangerous out there.  Stay inside.
    It also happens to be the anniversary of Bruce Lee's birthday.  He would have been 75 today, and in honor of him, I'm going to review a book of his that was actually written by him during his life time.  It was an early writing, but you can easily see where the now famous and quotable ideas came from.  In fact, most of his philosophy is there already.

Content

    The book is an original writing of Bruce Lee's that he intended to publish as a manuscript for Gung (Kung) Fu, to introduce it to more people.  Granted, it wasn't the finished version, but each section was completed.  It wasn't published during his lifetime, but it was the only book he wrote specifically for publication during his lifetime.  The Tao of Jeet Kune Do wasn't intended for publication, and was done so posthumously.

Pros

    I like that this Bruce's ideas in his own words.  This book was a conscious effort on his part to write to a western audience about kung fu in terms of physicality and philosophy.  As always Bruce Lee's words have a weight of truth to them.  Almost everything in this books can be applied to any martial art.  His words tend to focus more on the striking aspect of the martial arts, rather than the grappling aspect, but it still applies.
    One additional little thing I liked was the appendix of the book.  It looked at where Bruce Lee was in his studies at the time of this writing: He had studied Wing Chun for 7 years, Judo for 1 year, ect.  It helped put some of his ideas in perspective of where he was in his own path.

Cons

    I've read a couple of different versions of Bruce Lee's works recently, so some of the ideas are repeated from other writings.  That isn't to say that it isn't valid or valuable, just that if you're looking for "new secrets from Bruce Lee" this isn't the right place.  In fact, even a lot of the familiar language that we're used to from Bruce are initiated here.  "Be like water" and such.  So it shows almost a prequel to the man and the movies that we've all come to love.


Conclusion

    Overall I'm going to give this book 4 out of 5 ninja stars.  I love the philosophy that Bruce Lee believed in and tried to expand on for everyone else.  I think this is a polished look at where Bruce Lee was at this point in his journey.  It gives a very good spotlight of his views at this part of his path, and you can easily see where his more famous and quotable ideas originated.  You can also see how the notes he took in, what became, Tao of Jeet Kune Do started to change his ideas of martial arts.

Saturday, November 21, 2015

4/5 Ninja Stars for Bubishi by Patrick McCarthy

In the interest of full disclosure, I received this book from the publisher for review purposes
Title: Bubishi The Classic Manual of Combat
Translated with Commentary by: Patrick McCarthy
Publisher: Tuttle
Format: Hardcover
Cover Price: $27.95 $19.57(US)

    Bubishi is a title that's been hanging around my wishlist for a while now.  It's always been presented to me was as the "Bible of Karate."  Which I don't know quite how to take.  What does that mean?  Is it a series of rules and stories to live by if you're a karateka (person who does karate)?  In my head, it was kind of a Book of Five Rings or an Art of War, but somehow specifically written for karateka.  So I went into this book, not really knowing what to expect.  I have to say, as is more often the case than not, I was pleasantly surprised. 


NOTE: The editor just let me know that a new edition will be coming out in May 2016.  So start saving your pennies.

Content

    From what I gathered from Patrick McCarthy Hanshi is that the Bubishi was the original hand written Chinese Kung Fu manuals that made their way over to Ryuku islands (what we would think of as Okinawa) to somehow form the basis for the original Okinawan art of Te, which eventually became Karate.  Many of the originators of what today is called karate had their own hand-copied version of the Bubishi, and swore by it.  My interpretation of the book is that there is no one official Bubishi manual, but indeed several versions of it, all of which mostly overlap in material.  What Mr. McCarthy did was to hunt down many of those versions, coalesce them, and offer an modernized interpretation to them. 
    The book itself is divided into several different sections.  The first involves the histories, stories, and legends of what Chinese martial arts migrated to the islands, and why they each have a piece of validity to them.  He then breaks the articles in the Bubishi into related subjects.  There is a section on history and philosophy, one on Chinese Herbal Medicine, another on Vital Points, and the last section is on Fighting techniques.  There are also lots of pictures of the original manual with translations of the Chinese texts.

Pros

    The translation and commentary by Mr. McCarthy was definitely worth the book by itself.  He has obviously put a large amount of time and energy into this product.  In fact the version I read was the third or fourth re-write from the original, with more work and insight having been poured into each new edition.  I enjoyed the frank and thoughtful observation of the various theories of how the Bubishi and the Chinese arts made they way to the Okinawan islands with a critique of the value of each theory as to its validity.
    He also went to great troubles to get an accurate interpretation of  the writings themselves.  As he states many times, the older language was not only hard to translate by itself, but often rife with terms only meaningful to those of a specific dialect of Chinese.  I guess this is how a lot of the secrecy and Oriental mystique gets started, but I did enjoy that Indiana Jones research aspect to his contribution to the story.
    The portion on pressure points and fighting techniques seemed, to me, to be of the most universal use to martial artists of any ilk.  The pictures and descriptions would have to be gone over, and dissected many time before they would reveal their wisdom.  But, isn't that one of the fun parts of martial arts?

Cons

    I am not a subscriber to traditional Chinese medicine in anyway shape or form, just because I haven't found any science to back it up (did I mention I'm a science teacher), so that portion of the book held no interest for me.  I understand as a historical look at Karate, and the portion of Chinese culture that gave rise to Karate, it has value.  And I understand that it was part of the original Bubishi, so why it should be included, but for me, it was easily overlooked.  Maybe one day I'll go back and look at it more in depth.  In some ways I feel bad because I get the feeling that Mr. McCarthy had the most trouble, and put in the most effort with that section of articles of the Bubishi.

Conclusion

     I do believe that this book, and Mc. McCarthy's version in particular, probably has a lot to give any martial artist.  I don't practice karate, but the ideas of history, philosophy, pressure points, and techniques presented seem to be pretty universal, and deeper meaning than the once-over would reveal.  As such, I'm going to give the book 4 out of 5 Ninja Stars, just because I didn't find the Traditional Chinese Medicine portion useful.  I'm sure there are people out there that will scoff at me for that, but that's my opinion. 

Sunday, October 25, 2015

Episode XXXVI-Friendly Neighborhood Podcast Shownotes


powered by podcast garden


Subscribe through iTunes HERE

Link
Video
Contact
Buying

Intro Music: Theme from "Enter the Dragon" by Lalo Schifri

Introduction
  Recorded On: 10/21/2015
  Back to the Future Day
  Martial Thoughts: Fighting Words Podcast
  iTunes reviews
 
Interlude Music:  Stop (I'm already Dead) by Deadboy and the Elephant Men
 
Interview: Master David Stephens
  Kwong Sai Jook Lum Southern Praying Mantis Kung Fu
  Sho Kosugi
  Shaolin-do
  Craig Mitchel
  Frank Thomas
  Ng Family System
  Chuck Gross
  Master Gin Fun Mark (Video)
  Jim Thompson  Larry Tatum
  Ed Parker Jr.
  Kenpo Karate
  Balintawak (Filipino Martial Arts)
  The Last Dragon
  The Perfect Weapon (Jeff Speakman)
  Ip Man

  Contacts
    Shaolin Concepts
   
Interlude Music:  The Call of Ktulu by Metallica

This Week in Martial Arts: October 20th, 1948 Toshihiro Obata

Contact Information
Twitter Account: @martialthoughts
Email: martialthoughts@gmail.com
Atemicast Youtube Channel
www.thinkingmartial.blogspot.com
www.facebook.com/martialthoughts

Outro Music: Voodoo Chile-Jimi Hendrix / Gayageum ver. by Luna

4.5 Ninja Stars for two classic martial books

In the interest of full disclosure, I received these books from the publisher for review purposes

Title: The Art of War
Written by: Sun Tzu
Interpreted by: Stephen F. Kaufman
Publisher: Tuttle Publishing
Format: Softcover
Cover Price: $12.95 (US)

AND

Title: Book of Five Rings
Written by: Miyamoto Musashi
Interpreted by: Stephen F. Kaufman
Publisher: Tuttle Publishing
Format: Softcover
Cover Price: $13.95 (US)

    This is a little different type of review today.  First, I'm going to be reviewing two books at the same time.  Secondly, I'm not going to review the books themselves, but rather these particular versions of them.  The Art of War and Book of Five Rings are classic books that I believe everyone reading this has heard of, and probably read themselves.  However, each version that I have read (I own three different versions of each now) interprets them a little different.  Its fun to go through them and see how they take the same material and translate them differently.
    Both books have been claimed by the business community since the 80's as insightful books on how to conduct deals and corporate takeovers, but that wasn't their original purpose.  I can see why they are used that way, but I don't see them really being able to work with that intension.  They are books about conquering enemies and ruling people, not management and buyouts.  Business and war are very different aspects of humanity.  Both deal with conflict, true, but in very different ways.  That's why Kaufman Hanshi has gone beyond the simple idea of translating the books, and instead works as interpreter, speaking specifically to the martial artists out there.  What's funny is his introduction goes through and talks about how the Way of business and the Way of the sword are not the same, and how this version of the book is intended to be for, what he terms martialists, and then the back cover of the book, where it gives the category, says "business."

Pros

    Kaufman Hanshi really does a good job of taking both titles out of the poetic, esoteric type of writing into something more concrete.  He does keep some of the embellishing terms used throughout both books, but makes sure they make sense.  He also does a really good job of making sure everything is geared towards a martial reader.  This could be a martial artist, or a military officer, but they are both going to get something more out of this version than the others that are translated for a businessman.

Cons

   Anytime translation or interpretation is done, there will be some drift from the original text for interpretation's sake.  If you go in with that knowledge, then everything is fine.  However, there are some writings in Book of Five Rings that I haven't been able to find in other versions.  They still fit in exactly with the intent of the book, and indeed even explain things better than other versions I've read, but its still going outside the original author.  Just a picky point with me. 

Conclusion

    It is always hard to translate ancient foreign language texts into modern English.  There are many
terms and ideas that we don't have equivalent words for.  That being said, I really like both interpretations of these books.  I think that martial artists would do well do what I did, and take these texts along with other translations, and compare and contrast them.  I think when you do that, you get a much fuller, and complete version of what the original authors were trying to convey. 
    With all of that said, I'm going to give Kaufman Hanshi's interpretations of these two classics 4.5 out of 5 Ninja Stars, as they are very well done, and specific to the martialist audience that is reading them.  I just don't know if any one version of these books gets the full meaning into it.  But to be honest, these are the closest I've seen that gets the right intention across.

Thursday, October 15, 2015

Martial Thoughts: Fightin Words Episode 1-Tao of Jeet Kun Do


powered by podcast garden


Download the Episode HERE 
 
Link
Buying Link
Contacts

Recorded: 10/9/2015
Intro Music: Fight the Good Fight by Free
Topic of the Week:
Tao of Jeet Kun Do by Bruce Lee

Figh Like a Physicist by Dr. Jason Thalken
Meditations by Marcus Aurelius
Tuttle Publishing Bruce Lee Books are now available as e-books
Rory Miller
Jun Rhee

Contact Information
Twitter Account: @martialthoughts

Thursday, October 8, 2015

Martial Arts is for "Unnatural" Athletes

    Michael Jordon was not a "natural" basketball player.  It is well known that he got cut from his high school team1.  In fact, I'd venture to say there are no natural athletes in the world.  Going out on a limb, I'm say that all the things we think of as athletic abilities are only learned skills.  Speed, strength, and endurance are learned skills.  Learned from an early age, and encouraged by activities, but learned.  Sure, there are minute inherited differences that allow for those skills to shine better, or physical size enables ease of playing some sports, like basketball.  But think of it this way.  What if instead of weight classes in combat sports, what if we had height classes in basketball.  Then you could have shorter people, who might have just as much skill getting more high level coaching and learning to use their skills better, instead of focusing on anyone who's over 6'5".  What does this have to do with martial arts?  Well let me explain.

    I was always fairly athletic in high school.  I was on both the football and the track team.  However, because of my short stature, I didn't really fit in well with either sport.  On the football team, I was fast, but not fast enough for wide receiver or running back.  I was strong, but my size prevented my from playing on the line (until they saw me play in a game).  In track I had good endurance, but not enough to win at the long distance events.  I could do the long jump and high jump, but not enough to win at any meets.  Overall I was a good athlete, but not good enough at any one thing to specialize in it.
    Once high school ended, and I went to college, I started doing martial arts.  This is where my lack of specialization shined.  Martial arts seems to be made for the non-specialist.  The arts require coordination, strength, endurance, and a general kinesthetic sense.  All of which I learned playing sports.  I did end up playing left guard for my high school team, and because of my height, I had to learn (in hind sight, I know this is what I was doing) to use my center and control their center line.  I got quite good at it.  I learned a skill that would instantly come in handy once I started my martial arts. 

  I write all of this not to brag about myself, but to use myself as example.  I had no real success in high school sports, but the physical skills I learned there helped me later on in my martial arts.  I want to encourage anyone who is worried about the physical skill set required for martial arts.  Martial arts does not require specialization in a physical ability or skill set, instead the best martial artists should have a generalist approach to abilities.  They should have strength, skill, kinesthetic senses, endurance, flexibility, and coordination.  Even more importantly, they should have all in balance, with no one aspect in excess.  So all the people that we call "natural" athletes are usually those who have one skill or one physical ability which exceeds the others.  Martial arts is designed for those who don't have those excesses, the unnatural athlete.  Sure we all have our strengths and weaknesses.  For example, I am really low level in flexibility, but martial arts gives everyone an opportunity to practice these skills and places emphasis on all the learned physical skills.  That's what makes martial arts so special, and why so many of us unnatural athletes have found our place in the arts.

1. He tried out for his high school's varsity team as sophomore and despite being 5'11" the coach deemed him too short to play.